Former Federal Prosecutor Jonathan Fahey analyzes the demand for monopoly of Google ads in ‘Mornings with María’.
Google’s lawyers and the Justice Department appeared before a federal judge on Monday to Start trial procedures In a historical antitrust case, one that will determine how far Google should reach to break its monopolistic line search engine.
The high -risk trial, scheduled to play in the court for the next three weeks, could historically alter the fate of one of Silicon Valley’s largest technological giants.
Both the Department of Justice and Google will present remedies to resolve what the United States District Judge, Amit Mehta, ruled last summer, Google’s illegal monopoly in the space of online search engines.
| Heart | Security | Last | Change | Change % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splatter | Alphabet Inc. | 149.86 | -3.50 | -2.28% |
| AAPL | Apple inc. | 193.16 | -3.82 | -1.94% |
The result of the so -called “remedy test” could determine the future of the Google search engine, or the driving force of The $ 1.8 billion company. The lawyer of the Department of Justice, David Dahlquist, urged the Court on Monday to fulfill its previous frame, since it seeks to break Google’s domain in the online search engines sector.
Federal Judges in New York and Texas block Trump’s deportations after Scotus’s decision
The house of the court of E. Barrett Prettyman is seen in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
“Google’s illegal behavior has created an economic goliath, one that wreaks havoc on the market to ensure that, regardless of what happens, Google always wins,” the lawyers of the Department of Justice saying In your presentation.
They argued on Monday that Google’s search engine grew to dominate on the Internet largely for the payment of the company’s web browsers and certain smartphone manufacturers as a method to eliminate competition.
The Department of Justice has asked the Court to be asked to Google to sell its Chrome browser, share years of its consumption data with competitors and to potentially sell the Google smartphone operating system.
They said Monday that these steps could also prevent Google from obtaining a monopoly in the space of AI, recognizing that technology will evolve and, therefore, remedies must “include the ability to also evolve together with it.”
The president of the Supreme Court Roberts is directed to save Trump’s dismissal decision
Google logo in skyscrapers in the center of the center. (Roberto Machado Noa / Lightrocket through Getty Images / Getty Images)
“The remedy of this court must be prospective and not ignore what is on the horizon,” Dahlquist told the Court.
Google, meanwhile, has proposed a much closer remedies proposal.
The company’s lawyers told the Court on Monday that the framework proposed by the DOJ would be a remedy upside down, and one that they said would quell innovation and did not regulate the anti -competitive behavior that the plan set out to address.
And they reiterated that it could cause real damage to innovative services that depend on Google for searching for search, such as Mozilla Firefox.
The plan goes “miles beyond” relief ordered by Judge Mehta, Kent Walker, Vice President of Google Global Commitment, told Fox News Digital before the hearing.
“They have little or no relationship with the behavior that is anti -competitive and are contrary to the law,” Google argued.
The Supreme Court freezes the order to return the man in El Salvador prison
In Brussels, Belgium, on March 21, 2023, the Google Bard website is seen on the screen with Google AI in Mobile during the releases. (Jonathan Raa / Nurphoto through Getty Images / Getty Images)
Google executives have also summoned concerns about the range of consumers who could be forced to share with their competitors under the framework of resources presented by the DOJ, including US companies and foreign competitors, and have cited concerns that the amount of data shared in the proposal by the DOJ would present new risks for consumer privacy and national security.
His options submitted to the court include shorter contracts for browse companies, as apple and Mozilla; New contracts with Android, to allow additional flexibility and the option of preloading multiple search engines; and other important steps to make the panorama more competitive.
The two parties are expected to continue fighting for the remedies in the coming weeks, and Judge Mehta is expected to rule the case in June.
Click here to get the Fox News application
Meanwhile, both parties are scheduled to listen to the testimony of long witnesses lists, including Google officials.
Google lawyers said Monday they plan to call the CEO of Google, SUCTAL Pichai, as a witness in the case next week.
