Technology has long enabled architecture to boost the limits of form and function. Already in 1963, Sketchpad, one of the first architectural software programs, allowed architects and designers to move and change objects on the screen. Quickly, the traditional drawing of the hand gave way to a set of constant expansion programs (review, sketch and BIM, among many others) that helped create plans and plant sections, track the use of energy from buildings, improve sustainable construction and help follow construction codes, to name only a few uses.
The architects who exhibit in “transductions” see forms of recently evolved “as a new tool instead of developing professional aims,” says Vigneri-Beanene, despite what some of their classmates fear about technology. He adds: “I appreciate that it is something disconcerting for people, [but] I feel familiar with rhetoric. “
After all, he says, not only do The work. “To get something interesting and it is worth saving in AI, a huge amount of time is required,” he says. “My architectural vocabulary has become much more precise and my visual sense has made incredible training, exercising all these muscles that have stunted a bit.”
Vien agrees: “I think these are extremely powerful tools for an architect and designer. Do I think it is the future of architecture? No, but I think it is a tool and a medium that can expand the long history of media and means that architects can use not only to represent their work but as a generator of ideas.”
This image, part of the Urban Resolution series, shows how the stable diffusion AI model “cannot focus on building a realistic image and, on the other hand, double features that are prominent in the local latent space,” says Kudless.
